Get Involved

Become a Thought Partner

Partner with us to produce thought leadership that moves the needle on behavioral healthcare.

Other options to get involved

Thank you!

We received your information and will be in contact soon!

More Think Work

Get Involved

Engage Us as Consultants

Need help building capacity within your organization to drive transformational change in behavioral health? Contact us to learn more about our services available on a sliding fee scale.

Other options to get involved

Thank you!

We reiceived your information and will be in contact soon!

More Think Work

Get Involved

Seeking Support

Select from one of the funding opportunities below to learn more or apply.

Other options to get involved


We fund organizations and projects which disrupt our current behavioral health space and create impact at the individual, organizational, and societal levels.

Participatory Funds

Our participatory funds alter traditional grantmaking by shifting power
to impacted communities to direct resources and make funding decisions.

Special Grant Programs

We build public and private partnerships to administer grant dollars toward targeted programs.

Program Related Investments

We provide funds at below-market interest rates that can be particularly useful to start, grow, or sustain a program, or when results cannot be achieved with grant dollars alone.

Get Involved

Tia Burroughs Clayton, MSS
Learning and Community Impact Consultant

Add some text here

Alyson Ferguson, MPH
Chief Operating Officer

Contact Alyson about grantmaking, program related investments, and the paper series.

Vivian Figueredo, MPA
Learning and Community Impact Consultant

Derrick M. Gordon, PhD
Learning and Community Impact Consultant

Add some text here

Georgia Kioukis, PhD
Learning and Community Impact Consultant

Add some text here

Samantha Matlin, PhD
Senior Learning & Community Impact Consultant

Contact Samantha about program planning and evaluation consulting services.

Caitlin O'Brien, MPH
Director of Learning & Community Impact

Contact Caitlin about the Community Fund for Immigrant Wellness, the Annual Innovation Award, and trauma-informed programming.

Joe Pyle, MA

Contact Joe about partnership opportunities, thought leadership, and the Foundation’s property.

Nadia Ward, MEd, PhD
Learning and Community Impact Consultant

Add some text here

Bridget Talone, MFA
Grants Manager for Learning and Community Impact

Add some text here

Hitomi Yoshida, MSEd
Graduate Fellow

Add some text here

Ashley Feuer-Edwards, MPA
Learning and Community Impact Consultant

Add some text here

ARTIC Scale: Measure of Trauma-Informed Care

Traumatic Stress Institute of Klingberg Family Centers

ARTIC Scale: Measure of Trauma-Informed Care Logo

Program Website
Winner Status:
Program Type:
Policy and Systems Change
Target Population:
Providers and Caregivers
Business/Work Site

Program Description

The concept of trauma-informed care (TIC) reflects two realities: 1) exposure to trauma and childhood adversity is shockingly common and results in lifelong health consequences; and 2) organizations serving trauma survivors unintentionally use practices that at best are ineffective and at worst cause harm. In the last decade, the Traumatic Stress Institute (TSI) has become a national leader in the TIC field. We discovered in our work that theory about TIC was flourishing and there was rapid growth in implementation strategies, but there was little agreement about how to operationalize TIC and scant research supporting its efficacy. One important gap, we concluded, was the lack of tools to measure the concept. The Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care (ARTIC) Scale is one of the first psychometric measures of TIC published in the peer-reviewed literature. It was developed by TSI and Courtney Baker, Ph.D., of Tulane University. The ARTIC is based on the theory that moment-to-moment staff behavior is core to TIC and staff attitudes are an important driver of that behavior. The ARTIC has three versions for human service and educational settings (a 45-item, 35-item, and 10-item short form) and seven subscales measuring different domains of staff attitudes.


TSI believes deeply in evaluating its work, yet lacked the expertise to do so. To solve this dilemma, we forged a partnership with Dr. Baker. We used our unique areas of expertise to identify this critical gap in the TIC field and fill it with a user-friendly, cost-effective, and empirically-based tool to help organizations assess the impact of their TIC interventions. Whereas previously most TIC research was based on self-designed tools with few psychometric properties, the ARTIC provided a scientifically robust measure relevant across a wide variety of organizations. TSI created a system for disseminating the ARTIC Scale that both fosters its wide use and generates income for further research. The original ARTIC has now opened the door for a revised instrument, the ARTIC-2, now in development. TSI and Dr. Baker also partnered to pilot an online dashboard to display ARTIC scores for individuals and organizations using the measure.


The 114 entities that have acquired the ARTIC are using it to evaluate their TIC implementation efforts overall, monitor how TIC is sustained, and target strategies based on ARTIC scores. For example, a low score by outreach workers on the vicarious trauma-related subscale can trigger organizational support for their self-care. On a wider level, TSI believes the groundbreaking development of the ARTIC challenges organizations to operationalize what they mean when they say, “Yes, we’re trauma-informed.” It urges them to drill down and define the staff behavior, treatment methods, and policies required to promote healing for survivors of trauma and adversity. In a funding environment that values rigorous evaluation of TIC (SAMHSA, 2014), the ARTIC can spur the TIC field to create additional measures and advance toward more evidence-based interventions. TSI is disseminating information about the ARTIC through conferences, articles, free webinars, TIC organizations, and word of mouth.


TSI has been deliberate about laying the groundwork for ARTIC sustainability. The ARTIC is copyrighted through the US National Copyright Office. TSI and Tulane have established a formal partnership to sustain and advance the ARTIC. For example, Dr. Baker, with TSI’s support, will conduct a validity study of the ARTIC in spring 2018 that will be submitted for publication in June. The study will result in a revised version of the measure, the ARTIC–2. The funds from this award will be utilized to determine how best to disseminate the ARTIC-2. The ever-increasing demand for the ARTIC demonstrates the hunger in the field for instruments to measure TIC. Our vision is that, in 10 years, there are a variety of standardized tools measuring such things as TIC staff behavior or consumer satisfaction with TIC services, all aimed at survivors receiving the highest quality care.


TSI distributes the ARTIC with scoring instructions, an Excel spreadsheet to compute scores, and ARTIC files for the Qualtrics data collection platform to make it easy for users to accurately calculate scores and use the data to drive decision making. An online dashboard to display and track scores will enhance its appeal and usability for diverse organizations, especially those lacking data expertise. The entities that have acquired the ARTIC are mostly using it in the human service and education sectors. The potential for expanded use in other sectors serving trauma survivors is vast and includes medicine, corrections, the military, religious institutions, youth development, law enforcement, government, and the courts. Future efforts could adapt the ARTIC specifically to these sectors. Finally, the ARTIC Scale is only being sold in English. There has been interest in translating the measure into other languages which could exponentially spread its use worldwide.


Since April 2016, 114 entities from more than 30 US States and 4 countries have acquired the ARTIC. There was a 43% increase in requests from 2016 to 2017. Six entities are using it at more than 10 research/evaluation sites each. Dr. Baker maintains a database with 3500 ARTIC respondents. A conservative estimate is that the 114 entities will administer it to over 25,000 professionals. Large-scale users include the Chicago and Baltimore city school systems. Both Tulane and TSI have repeatedly shown that the ARTIC can detect statistically significant increases in attitudes favorable to TIC from the beginning to the end of a multi-day training. The ARTIC also relates reliably to other metrics relevant to TIC such as staff burnout and secondary traumatic stress. Since many using the ARTIC are researchers, we anticipate numerous upcoming peer-review journal articles referencing use of the ARTIC.